Lizaro counts roughly 12,850 games from 120 studios, and the honest way to read that number is comparatively. Against a mid-market offshore lobby carrying three to ten thousand titles, Lizaro is two to four times the size. Against the lobbies most readers already use, it is broader and shallower at the same time, because the two studios almost every player can name by heart are missing from it.
That tension is what this page is about. No money of mine went through this cashier, and nothing below pretends otherwise. What I did was count: I opened the provider directory and worked down all 120 entries with their live game counts, logged the home-page category tiles one by one, noted which live-dealer suppliers appear and which do not, and read the bonus annex for the list of titles that stop counting the moment a bonus is active. Every figure here came off the operator’s own pages on 27 October 2026, and every figure here is checkable by anyone willing to spend an hour doing the same thing.

What 12,850 games is worth, measured against the alternatives
Library size is the easiest casino statistic to inflate and the least useful one in isolation. A thousand titles you would play beats ten thousand you would not. So instead of repeating Lizaro’s headline, I put the parts of a library that actually change a player’s evening side by side with what a reader is realistically choosing between: a large licensed offshore lobby, and a smaller curated one.
| Library attribute | Lizaro | Large licensed offshore lobby | Small curated lobby |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published game count | ≈12,850 | 4,000 to 10,000 | 400 to 1,200 |
| Studios represented | 120 | 40 to 90 | 12 to 30 |
| Evolution live tables | Absent | Almost always present | Usually the centrepiece |
| Pragmatic Play slots | Absent | Almost always present | Frequently present |
| Live-casino tables surfaced | 110 | 150 to 400 | 30 to 80 |
| Crash-game depth | 24 | 15 to 40 | 3 to 10 |
| Demo play without an account | Yes, most slots | Varies by jurisdiction | Often blocked |
| Per-game RTP shown in the lobby | Not surfaced | Sometimes shown | Often shown |
Four rows favour Lizaro and four do not, which is roughly how the whole lobby feels once you have spent time in it. The breadth is real and it is not padding: I checked the arithmetic rather than trusting the banner. The gaps are also real, and they are not the kind you discover slowly. You notice them the first time you look for a specific game and it is not there.
Where the ≈12,850 figure comes from
Lizaro does not print a single library total on the home page. The provider directory does something better: it lists each of the 120 studios with the number of titles the casino holds from that studio. Add the column and you get a shade under 12,900. That is a verifiable number rather than a marketing one, and I would rather have a sum I can audit than a round figure somebody chose.
Two caveats come with it. The counts move, because studios ship weekly and the directory updates with them, so treat the total as a snapshot and not a constant. And a count of titles held is not a count of titles available to you: one annex to the terms confines a set of in-house games to listed countries only, so your personal lobby will be slightly smaller than the directory suggests, by an amount neither of us can measure from outside.
The studios that carry the lobby
This is where a library’s character lives. A casino with 120 suppliers sounds evenly spread, and it never is. Seventeen studios account for about 6,050 titles between them, which is close to 47% of everything on the site. The remaining 103 studios split the other half, averaging roughly 66 games each.
| Studio | Titles held | Share of library | What that studio brings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spinomenal | 813 | 6.3% | High-volume slot output, mythology and fruit themes |
| Playtech | 688 | 5.4% | The one genuinely blue-chip name in the top five |
| Foxi | 536 | 4.2% | Volume supplier, little brand recognition |
| Yggdrasil | 512 | 4.0% | Mechanic-led slots with a strong back catalogue |
| Amusnet | 390 | 3.0% | Formerly EGT, land-based style reels |
| Hacksaw Gaming | 357 | 2.8% | High-volatility modern slots and scratch titles |
| Red Tiger | 338 | 2.6% | Daily-jackpot mechanics, polished presentation |
| Evoplay | 287 | 2.2% | Experimental formats, 3D and instant games |
| CT Interactive | 272 | 2.1% | Eastern European land-based conversions |
| Tada Gaming | 267 | 2.1% | Asian-market slots and fishing games |
| Flatdog | 250 | 1.9% | Newer volume studio |
| Betsoft | 243 | 1.9% | Cinematic slots, long-standing crypto-casino staple |
| Amatic | 239 | 1.9% | Austrian land-based classics |
| BGaming | 234 | 1.8% | Crypto-native slots and provably fair dice titles |
| Oryx | 215 | 1.7% | Aggregated content plus its own studios |
| Endorphina | 207 | 1.6% | Simple reels with distinctive themes |
| Booming Games | 200 | 1.6% | Mid-volatility slots, consistent output |
Read the names rather than the numbers and a pattern appears. The top of this list is built on volume suppliers, not on prestige ones. Spinomenal, Foxi, Flatdog, CT Interactive and Tada Gaming are all studios that ship a great deal of content; none of them is a studio a player seeks out by name. Playtech, Yggdrasil, Hacksaw and Red Tiger are the four entries in the upper reaches that carry genuine recognition, and between them they hold about 1,900 titles, or around 15% of the lobby.
That is not a criticism of the content so much as a description of it. Players who pick a studio and work through its catalogue, four of those catalogues are here in depth and most are not. Anyone who prefers to scroll until something catches the eye, the lobby is generous to you in a way a 600-game site cannot be.
The two names that are not here
I expected to find Evolution and Pragmatic Play in a provider list this long, and neither appears. For a lobby approaching thirteen thousand titles, it is the most surprising single finding on this page, and it deserves to be stated flatly rather than buried in a pros-and-cons box.
Evolution is the dominant live-casino supplier in the European market; its tables are what most players mean when they say “live casino”, and its game-show formats are the reason that category exists at all. Pragmatic Play is one of the most widely distributed slot studios in the world, and its titles sit near the top of the popular list at most casinos that carry them. Their joint absence is not a rounding error in a list of 120 suppliers. It is a structural fact about what this lobby can offer.
Why, I cannot say, and speculating about commercial terms or distribution rules would be guesswork I have no evidence for. Supplier absence can reflect licensing policy at the studio end, aggregator arrangements, regional restrictions, or simply a deal that was never signed. What I can tell you is the consequence, which is the part that affects your evening.
What the absence changes in practice
- No Lightning Roulette, Crazy Time or Monopoly Live. The entire Evolution game-show canon is unavailable, which explains why the game-shows category here holds only 35 titles.
- No Sweet Bonanza, Gates of Olympus or Big Bass series. If your bonus-buy habit is built on Pragmatic mechanics, the 792 bonus-buy titles here are a different set of games with a different feel.
- Tournament and network promotions look different. Many casino-wide drop promotions are supplier-run networks; without those two studios, the equivalents here are in-house challenges and the Wheel of Fortune instead.
- Comparison shopping gets harder. Players judge lobbies by familiar titles. With the two most familiar catalogues missing, you cannot benchmark this one against your last casino by looking for a game you know.
None of that makes the library bad. It makes it unfamiliar, which is a different problem and in some ways a more interesting one. There is a type of player who has worked through the Pragmatic catalogue twice and would genuinely enjoy 536 Foxi titles they have never opened. There is also a type who wants the specific game they came for, and for them a 12,850-title lobby that lacks it is functionally empty.
The live-dealer floor: who deals the cards
With Evolution absent, the live floor runs on a supplier set most readers will not recognise, and it is worth knowing who they are before you sit down. Seven studios appear, and they are not interchangeable.
| Live supplier | What it mainly provides | Practical note |
|---|---|---|
| CreedRoomz Live | Roulette, blackjack, baccarat, poker variants | The broadest of the seven, usually the default tables |
| Imagine Live | Roulette and card tables, multi-language dealers | Strong Eastern European and Turkish-language coverage |
| SA Gaming | Baccarat-led Asian-market floor | Baccarat depth well above the European norm |
| Live Vegas | Classic table set | Smaller studio, fewer concurrent tables |
| Lucky Streak | Roulette, blackjack, baccarat | Established mid-tier supplier, reliable streams |
| AE Sexy | Baccarat and dice, presenter-led format | A style choice, not to everyone’s taste |
| BetGames.TV | Lottery-style and betting-on-draws formats | Closer to a betting product than a casino table |
The home page surfaces 110 top live-casino tables, with 152 blackjack and 136 roulette entries across live and virtual combined. That is a respectable floor by count. By depth at a given moment it is thinner than the number implies, because several of these suppliers run small studios, and a small studio means fewer seats when a popular table fills. The observed stake range across live tables runs from €0.10 to €2,000, which covers a very wide band of players, though the high end will be available on a handful of tables rather than across the floor.
We do not recommend Lizaro’s live-dealer floor to players whose sessions are built around Evolution’s game shows or who want a seat at a busy branded table during European peak hours. The suppliers here are competent and the streams are serious products, but they are a substitution, not an equivalent, and a player who sits down expecting Crazy Time will have a worse evening than one who comes for baccarat on SA Gaming. The slot library deserves its credit independently of this; the live floor is the one part of the lobby where the missing names cost you something concrete.
Reading the category tiles
Lizaro puts a live count on each home-page category, which is more transparency than most lobbies offer and makes the shape of the library legible at a glance. Here is what the tiles showed on capture day, with what each one tells you.
| Category | Titles | What the figure says |
|---|---|---|
| New | 1,349 | Heavy onboarding of fresh content, mostly from volume studios |
| Popular | 908 | A broad definition of popular, not a tight top-100 |
| Bonus Buys | 792 | Genuine depth; one of the strongest categories here |
| Top | 748 | Geo-dependent; the row changes with the country you browse from |
| Hot Jackpots | 382 | Jackpot exposure is substantial, spread over five sections |
| Blackjack | 152 | Live and virtual combined, a solid mid-market figure |
| Roulette | 136 | Comparable depth, including the live tables above |
| Top Live Casino | 110 | The live floor at its widest, across seven suppliers |
| Game Shows | 35 | The thinnest major category, a direct result of the absences |
| Crash Games | 24 | Present but not a focus; enough for the format’s regulars |
The distribution is informative. A library where “New” holds 1,349 titles is a library being fed continuously, which is the upside of a volume-supplier roster. A library where game shows hold 35 is one whose live entertainment layer is an afterthought. And the country-keyed “Top” strip is a small detail with a real effect: the row Lizaro shows a Serbian visitor is not the row it shows a Polish one, so if a friend describes the lobby differently from how you see it, neither of you is wrong.
Why 792 bonus-buy titles matters
Bonus-buy games let you pay a fixed multiple of your stake to jump straight into a feature round, and they have become the centre of gravity for high-volatility slot play. Having 792 of them is a genuine strength and the category I would point to first if someone asked what Lizaro does better than its size-peers.
One warning attaches, and it belongs to the terms rather than to the games. A Prohibited Games list applies while any bonus is active, and the named titles in it include 10x Rewind, Le Kaffee Bar, Scarab Treasure, Aztec Emerald, Wild Hearts, Starfang, Guardians of Inari and Cave of Fortune. Check the full list against your favourites before you claim anything, because playing an excluded title with bonus funds active is the easiest way to lose a balance you thought you had earned. The arithmetic of how those funds clear is laid out on the page covering Lizaro’s promotions and their rollover.
Five jackpot sections and a ticker that moves
Lizaro runs jackpot content through five separate sections: Hot Jackpots, New Jackpots, Drops & Wins, Lucky Jackpots and Jackpot Play. Together they surface 382 titles in the headline tile, and the live tickers I watched were reading €7,929.96, €28,405.15 and €57,853.19. Those figures climb continuously and mean nothing by the time you read this; quote them as a scale, never as a value.
One oddity I will flag without resolving. A section carrying the Drops & Wins name sits in the lobby while Pragmatic Play, the studio that made that promotion format famous, does not appear in the provider directory. I have no way from outside to tell whether that is a differently sourced network of the same name, a legacy label, or something else, so I am logging the observation and leaving the conclusion open.
The practical point about jackpots here has nothing to do with the games and everything to do with the cashier, so I will state it once and move on. A progressive pool can pay more in one hit than the account can release in a month, because monthly withdrawal ceilings apply by loyalty level. What each loyalty level actually releases sets out those ceilings; if you play jackpot slots seriously, read that before you choose a jackpot section.
Slots: the part of the lobby that justifies the size
Strip out live, jackpots, table games, crash and game shows and the overwhelming majority of those 12,850 titles are slots. This is a slot casino with other things attached, and judged as a slot casino it holds up well against both comparison sets from the first table.
The texture varies by supplier bloc in a way worth knowing. The Amusnet, Amatic and CT Interactive blocs are land-based conversions: simple reels, modest volatility, the feel of a machine in a bar. Hacksaw, Evoplay and BGaming sit at the other end, with modern high-variance mechanics and the sharp loss-and-recovery rhythm that goes with them. Spinomenal, Foxi, Flatdog and Tada supply the middle in bulk. Yggdrasil and Red Tiger bring the mechanic-led design and the daily-jackpot layers that give a lobby its polish.
Arriving from a Pragmatic-heavy casino, the adjustment is real but navigable: Hacksaw’s catalogue is the closest match for high-volatility bonus-buy play, and Red Tiger covers the daily-drop habit. Coming across from a land-based background, the Amusnet and Amatic blocs will feel immediately familiar, and they are deeper here than at most online lobbies.
RTP and volatility: what is published, and what is not
Here is the gap I would most like Lizaro to close. The provider directory publishes counts. It does not publish a return-to-player figure per title, and in the views I examined the lobby offered no RTP column and no way to filter or sort by RTP or by volatility band. Those figures exist, though the studios themselves publish them inside each game, but the casino does not surface them where a player chooses what to open.
Two things follow. First, a player who selects games on published RTP has to look each title up at the studio, one at a time, which across almost thirteen thousand titles is not a workable habit. Second, and more importantly: some studios ship the same slot at several configurable RTP settings, and the operator chooses which one it runs. Without a published figure in the lobby, there is no way to know from the outside which configuration you are playing.
No independent testing-lab certification is published on the site either: I found no seal from eCOGRA, iTech Labs, GLI or any comparable laboratory. That belongs to the broader trust question rather than to the games, and it is handled properly in our full assessment of how far Lizaro can be taken on trust.
Demo play, and why it is the most useful feature here
Most slots carry a Demo button on the tile, and it works without an account. No email, no date of birth, no deposit, no country check beyond the one the site already applied. For a casino with the transparency problems this one has, free demo access is the single most valuable thing it offers, because it lets you verify the library claim yourself before any of the other questions matter.
That is not a small point. The usual order of operations at a new casino is: hand over your details, fund the account, then find out whether you like the games. Here you can reverse it. Thirty minutes in demo mode across four or five unfamiliar studios will tell you more about whether this lobby suits you than any review can, including this one. If the Foxi and Spinomenal catalogues bore you, you have learned that for free, and the rest of the site becomes irrelevant.
Two limits on demo mode are worth setting out. It does not run on live-dealer tables, which are real dealers at real tables and cannot be simulated, so the live floor can only be judged after registration. And demo results carry no information about your real-money outcomes; a demo session that runs hot tells you about variance, not about the game.
Finding things in a 12,850-game lobby
Breadth creates a navigation problem that smaller casinos never face, and how a lobby solves it matters as much as what it holds. Lizaro’s answer is category rows with live counts, a provider directory you can browse by studio, and a search field. That is adequate rather than clever.
What works: the provider directory is genuinely good, and browsing by studio is the fastest route into a library this size once you know which four or five studios you like. The counts on every tile and every studio entry mean you always know how deep a category goes before you commit to scrolling it.
What does not: the lobby offers no way to sort by return percentage or variance, as covered above, and the “Top” row keys off your country, which means the most prominent recommendation strip on the page is not personal to you but to your country. Nothing here helps a player narrow 12,850 titles down by the properties that actually distinguish slots from one another. In a lobby this large, filters are not a luxury feature.
The lobby on a phone
Lizaro publishes no native app, so the mobile lobby is the browser lobby, and category rows reflow into a single scrolling column. The practical effect on game choice is that the deep categories become long scrolls: 1,349 new titles in a one-column layout is a lot of thumb travel, and the provider directory becomes the better entry point on a small screen than the category rows are. The absent-app finding itself, and what browser play means for day-to-day use, is covered on the page about playing Lizaro without an app.
Your lobby is not everyone’s lobby
Three separate mechanisms make the library you see different from the library the directory describes, and all three are worth holding in mind when you compare notes with another player.
- The geo-dependent Top row reorders the most visible recommendations by country.
- A narrower annex in the terms limits several in-house titles to a listed group of countries, Poland among them, so one reader’s lobby holds games another reader’s does not.
- The excluded-jurisdictions list is the blunt version: residents of a long list of countries cannot register at all, which makes the library question moot for them. The countries, and why that list is the shape it is, sit in the analysis of what the terms do and do not disclose.
The cashier adds a fourth layer of locale variation on top of those, since the methods and the minimums both change with the country you select. If you want the version that applies to your account, the rails and ceilings, method by method lists them per currency.
Who this library suits
Compared with a smaller curated lobby, Lizaro gives you more to explore and less guidance about what to explore. Compared with a large licensed one, it gives you comparable breadth without the two catalogues that make a lobby feel familiar. That trade is a good one for some players and a bad one for others, and the split is fairly clean.
It suits the explorer: someone who enjoys opening a studio they have never heard of, who plays modest stakes across many titles, and who will use demo mode before funding anything. It suits land-based regulars, because the Austrian and Bulgarian conversion catalogues run deep here. It suits bonus-buy players willing to learn a new set of mechanics, with 792 titles to work through and the prohibited list checked first.
It suits less well the player with a fixed favourite from a missing studio, the live-casino regular whose evening is a branded game show, the RTP-selective player who needs published figures to choose, and the high-stakes jackpot chaser, for whom the monthly release ceiling matters more than any game in the lobby.
Sources
- Lizaro’s provider directory and lobby: counted entry by entry on 27 October 2026, and the origin of every studio count, category figure and supplier name above.
- Casino Guru’s casino database: the independent reference used to sanity-check library and operator claims against a second record, and the origin of the safety score quoted elsewhere here.
- Public registers of licensed operators: the kind of primary record a player can use to confirm who stands behind a lobby, whichever market they play in.
Frequently asked questions
How many game providers does Lizaro list?
The provider directory lists 120 studios, each with a live title count beside it. Those counts add to roughly 12,850 games across the whole lobby.
Why are there no Pragmatic Play slots at Lizaro?
The provider directory holds no Pragmatic Play entry at all, and Lizaro publishes no explanation. The absence is factual; the reason is not disclosed.
Which live-casino studios does Lizaro use?
Seven: CreedRoomz Live, Imagine Live, SA Gaming, Live Vegas, Lucky Streak, AE Sexy and BetGames.TV. No Evolution tables appear.
Can I try Lizaro games for free?
Yes. Most slot tiles carry a Demo button that opens the game without registration. Live-dealer tables cannot be demoed, since they use real dealers.
Does Lizaro show the RTP of each game?
No RTP figure is surfaced in the lobby and there is no RTP or volatility filter. The studios publish those numbers in their own game information panels.
How many blackjack and roulette games are there?
152 blackjack entries and 136 roulette entries, counting live and virtual together, with 110 tables surfaced in the top live-casino row.
Which studio has the most games at Lizaro?
Spinomenal, with 813 titles, ahead of Playtech on 688, Foxi on 536 and Yggdrasil on 512. The top seventeen studios hold about 47% of the library.
Are any games blocked while a bonus is active?
Yes. A Prohibited Games list applies, naming titles including 10x Rewind, Le Kaffee Bar, Scarab Treasure, Aztec Emerald and Cave of Fortune.
How big are the Lizaro jackpots?
Five jackpot sections surface 382 titles. Live tickers read between €7,929 and €57,853 on capture day, and those pools change constantly.
Do all players see the same games?
No. The “Top” row is country-dependent, and one clause in the terms keeps a few in-house games inside a listed group of countries.
The verdict on the library
7.2 out of 10 for the games and the studios behind them, which is half a point above the score this site gives Lizaro overall, and the gap is deliberate. The library is the strongest thing here.
Set beside a big licensed offshore operation, Lizaro wins on raw breadth, on studio count, on bonus-buy depth and on free demo access, and loses on the two supplier names that define most players’ sense of a casino. Measured against a small curated lobby, it wins on everything except curation itself: there is no editorial hand helping you choose, no RTP filter, and a recommendation row that answers to your country rather than to you. Measured against its own marketing, it comes out well, which is rarer than it should be. The 12,850 figure is a sum you can audit, not a number someone rounded up.
What stops this from scoring higher is not the Evolution and Pragmatic absence, which is a matching problem rather than a quality one. It is the missing information layer. A 12,850-game library with no published RTP, no volatility filter and no certification seal asks a player to choose in the dark across a very large room. The demo button is the one real answer to that, and it is a good one. Use it before anything else, decide whether the unfamiliar studios earn your time, and treat the rest of this site’s findings on accountability as the separate question they are.